Difference between revisions of "Fall 2022 Schedule"

From CompSemWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 36: Line 36:
 
| 02.09.22 || Invited talk: Aniello de Santo (TBC)
 
| 02.09.22 || Invited talk: Aniello de Santo (TBC)
 
|- style="border-top: 2px solid DarkGray;"
 
|- style="border-top: 2px solid DarkGray;"
| 02.16.22 || Ghazaleh proposal defense
+
| 02.16.22 || Ghazaleh Kazeminejad, proposal defense
 
|- style="border-top: 2px solid DarkGray;"
 
|- style="border-top: 2px solid DarkGray;"
 
| 02.23.22 ||  
 
| 02.23.22 ||  
Line 50: Line 50:
 
| 03.30.22 ||  
 
| 03.30.22 ||  
 
|- style="border-top: 2px solid DarkGray;"
 
|- style="border-top: 2px solid DarkGray;"
| 04.06.22 || Abteen prelim (TBC)
+
| 04.06.22 || Abteen Ebrahimi, prelim (TBC)
 
|- style="border-top: 2px solid DarkGray;"
 
|- style="border-top: 2px solid DarkGray;"
| 04.13.22 || Ananya prelim (TBC)
+
| 04.13.22 || Ananya Ganesh, prelim (TBC)
 
|- style="border-top: 2px solid DarkGray;"
 
|- style="border-top: 2px solid DarkGray;"
| 04.20.22|| Adam prelim (TBC)
+
| 04.20.22|| Adam Wiemerslage, prelim (TBC)
 
|- style="border-top: 2px solid DarkGray;"
 
|- style="border-top: 2px solid DarkGray;"
| 04.27.22 || Sagi prelim (TBC)
+
| 04.27.22 || Sagi Shaier, prelim (TBC)
 
|- style="border-top: 2px solid DarkGray;"
 
|- style="border-top: 2px solid DarkGray;"
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 16:50, 13 January 2022

Location: 279, Fleming Building.

Time: 10:30am, Mountain Time

Zoom link: https://cuboulder.zoom.us/j/97014876908

Date Title
1.12.22 Planning, introductions, welcome!

CompSem meetings will be virtual until 24th of January (https://cuboulder.zoom.us/j/97014876908), then hybrid- in person at Fleming 279, and online at the previous zoom link

01.19.22 Kai Larsen, CU Boulder Leeds School of Business

Validity in Design Research

Research in design science has always recognized the importance of evaluating its knowledge outcomes, particularly of assessing the efficacy, utility, and attributes of the artifacts produced (e.g., A.I. systems, machine learning models, theories, frameworks). However, demonstrating the validity of design science research (DSR) is challenging and not well understood. This paper defines DSR validity and proposes a DSR Validity Framework. We evaluate the framework by assembling and analyzing an extensive data set of research validities papers from various disciplines, including design science. We then analyze the use of validity concepts in DSR and validate the framework. The results demonstrate that the DSR Validity Framework may be used to guide how validity can, and should, be used as an integral aspect of design science research. We further describe the steps for selecting appropriate validities for projects and formulate efficacy validity and characteristic validity claims suitable for inclusion in manuscripts.

Keywords: Design science research (DSR), research validity, validity framework, artifact, evaluation, efficacy validity, characteristic validity.

01.26.22 Elizabeth Spaulding, prelim
02.02.22
02.09.22 Invited talk: Aniello de Santo (TBC)
02.16.22 Ghazaleh Kazeminejad, proposal defense
02.23.22
03.02.22
03.09.22 Kevin Cohen
03.16.22 Chelsea Chandler, defense (TBC)
03.23.22 ***Spring Break***
03.30.22
04.06.22 Abteen Ebrahimi, prelim (TBC)
04.13.22 Ananya Ganesh, prelim (TBC)
04.20.22 Adam Wiemerslage, prelim (TBC)
04.27.22 Sagi Shaier, prelim (TBC)


Past Schedules